When a recollection of data introduced different formats and deduplication complications, CDS was hired to develop custom deduplication options to maximize efficiency of a large-scale managed review.
Our Blog
Thought Leadership and Industry Trends
3 Ways the Right Dashboard Can Improve eDiscovery Workflows
As eDiscovery tools evolve, they are addressing a broader array of workflow issues. Project managers, law firms and companies can make use of new features to help them with all aspects of document review and production as well as for deposition and trial preparation.
TAR Case Law Update: High Rate of Non-Responsive Documents in Production Can Extend Discovery
Dan Diette examines the recent decision from In Re Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust Litigation and its implications on TAR in discovery.
Decoding Continuous Active Learning with CDS London
Following our recent breakfast seminar on Continuous Active Learning (CAL), CDS’ Mark Anderson and Bill Belt share their conclusions.
How Technology Can Improve Quality Control in eDiscovery
Quality control in eDiscovery is a time consuming process, but with new technology to visualize data, companies are saving time and money.
Are the Machines Taking Over eDiscovery?
A common misconception is that advances in eDiscovery software, automation, and artificial intelligence will eventually replace the need for many legal professionals.
CDS Case Study: Brainspace Analytics Used to Dramatically Reduces Document Review Costs
To support a litigation case involving breach of contract, CDS was hired to deploy technology assisted review capabilities in order to meet a tight production deadline.
Understanding How Early Case Assessment Works
Early Case Assessment (ECA) refers to a variety of tools and workflows for investigating and quickly learning about your data as it relates to eDiscovery and potential litigation.
How Auto-Redaction Technology Can Streamline Your eDiscovery
Most eDiscovery requires redaction of information before it can be produced. Thanks to increasing regulations safeguarding personal information, the amount of redaction required is growing.
Winfield v. City of NY: What Happens When Computers and Humans Disagree in eDiscovery?
Predictive coding has become increasingly prevalent in eDiscovery. Although courts have ruled that parties are allowed to use the technology, they have also recognized that litigants aren’t required to use it. However, once a litigant has decided to employ predictive coding, the question is to what extent courts should permit discovery into, and allow opposing counsel, to re-examine and second guess a litigant’s TAR process?